Original Article

The monopoly of the procedural lawyer (CPC 68 II/a)

ATF 140 III 555 - The monopoly of the procedural lawyer (CPC 68 II/a) At a conciliation hearing in divorce proceedings, one of the spouses is accompanied by a non-lawyer representative. a CPC, only lawyers entered in the register within the meaning of Art. On appeal by the husband, the Cantonal Court confirms the decision of the first instance. He retains that the representative has no close ties with the party and that he does not pursue an ideal goal.....

This content comes from the blog "The monopoly of the procedural lawyer (CPC 68 II/a)", you can see the full article here.
Key Benefits

Start your adwords automated campaign right now, it’s gonna be amazing.

01. Optimized Google Ads performance
02. Pay Google Adwords for customers you get
03. Follow your Google ads revenues at any time
Start Now >

“We optimized our campaign in a few days and saved thousands of dollars, this is amazing.”

CEO of XYZ company
Check Pricing Now >
Key Benefits

Start your adwords automated campaign right now, it’s gonna be amazing.

01. Optimized Google Ads performance
02. Pay Google Adwords for customers you get
03. Follow your Google ads revenues at any time
Start Now >

“We optimized our campaign in a few days and saved thousands of dollars, this is amazing.”

CEO of XYZ company
Check Pricing Now >
Other articles that may interests you
Mar 04 2019

CPC and Veber Lawyers in pole position

Aware of the importance of consolidating their service offer, CPC independent firms

Read More >
Mar 04 2019

The monopoly of the procedural lawyer (CPC 68 II/a)

ATF 140 III 555 - The monopoly of the procedural lawyer (CPC 68 II/a) At a conciliation hearing in divorce proceedings, one of the spouses is accompanied by a non-lawyer representative. a CPC, only lawyers entered in the register within the meaning of Art. On appeal by the husband, the Cantonal Court confirms the decision of the first instance. He retains that the representative has no close ties with the party and that he does not pursue an ideal goal.....

Read More >
Mar 04 2019

The Court of Appeal held that the lawyer's gross negligence may constitute an impossibility to act

Most recently, in Heaslip v. McDonald, 2017 QCCA 1273, the Court of Appeal rendered an interesting decision on the question of whether the gross negligence of the lawyer may constitute an impossibility in fact to act within the strict time limit within the meaning of article 177 of the Code of Civil Procedure (C.C.P....

Read More >
Mar 04 2019

CPC and Veber Lawyers in pole position

Aware of the importance of consolidating their service offer, CPC independent firms

Read More >
Mar 04 2019

The monopoly of the procedural lawyer (CPC 68 II/a)

ATF 140 III 555 - The monopoly of the procedural lawyer (CPC 68 II/a) At a conciliation hearing in divorce proceedings, one of the spouses is accompanied by a non-lawyer representative. a CPC, only lawyers entered in the register within the meaning of Art. On appeal by the husband, the Cantonal Court confirms the decision of the first instance. He retains that the representative has no close ties with the party and that he does not pursue an ideal goal.....

Read More >
Mar 04 2019

The Court of Appeal held that the lawyer's gross negligence may constitute an impossibility to act

Most recently, in Heaslip v. McDonald, 2017 QCCA 1273, the Court of Appeal rendered an interesting decision on the question of whether the gross negligence of the lawyer may constitute an impossibility in fact to act within the strict time limit within the meaning of article 177 of the Code of Civil Procedure (C.C.P....

Read More >
Message